The Demise of Reading

The subtitle for this, my first blogpost, should probably be “The New Disability: An Evaporating Capacity to Engage Complex (or Even Just Lengthy) Texts.” The folks who work with me have heard me worry about this notion for some time now, and a recent Chronicle link drove the point home for me. The Chronicle story is titled “Americans are Closing the Book on Reading, Study Finds.” The study is by the National Endowment for the Arts, and can be read in its entirety here.

I won’t bore you with the details, and there’s plenty of reading yet for me to do in this report (small joke), but the implication that should give us alarm in academe is clear: everyone is reading less, and college-educated people are reading less in ways that suggest they are not models for succeeding generations to emulate in countering the trend. What does this mean for scholarship as we know it? I have some ideas, but that’s for some later discussion.

The point that interests me most today is this one: although it is clear in the report that “traditional” reading is competing poorly for the focus of our nation’s eyeballs when compared to other media, analysis of the elements of attraction in those other media rarely mentions something that I’d suggest may be critical. Reading as normally practiced is an isolated, individual activity. The activities that are really exploding in usage by the teenagers and young adults I see are group-based and community-oriented, practiced in a context of social networks. Can “authentic” reading take place in such a context?

Thanks to Martha, I’ve gotten a hint about the answer. BookGlutton.com is a beta site (and it really is beta, so don’t expect everything to work perfectly) through which readers can read books (at least those in the public domain) via a pleasant interface, annotate for their own use (if they choose), but also read in groups with shared annotation and real-time chat about what they’re reading. As currently laid out, it isn’t completely clear how to get access, but if you look at the top of this page, you’ll see a box to enter your e-mail address and a checkbox to receive the newsletter. That’s where you start.

After some struggles to get the authentication for my account to work properly, I’m in, and I’m intrigued at the possibilities. Does this offer an answer to the decline of engaged reading? I’m not sure, but I think it is on the right exploratory track because it starts from the assumption that reading can be a live, real-time social experience. I’m betting future generations will discover that a lifelong love of reading can indeed start in that context. As in most things, look to the kids themselves. They’ll show us the answer, if we’re smart enough to see it.

UPDATE: 11/20/07 — Amazon’s introduction of the “Kindle” today means that lots of folks are discussing this topic in real time. WBUR is broadcasting an interesting discussion that includes Steven Levy, author of a Newsweek story on this subject, and Sven Bikerts, author of The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. So far, the discussion has touched on the difference between individual reading and “group” reading, with concern expressed (I believe it was from Bikerts) about the homogenization (my term, not his) of thinking that results from a group reading experience.

UPDATE: 12/4/07 — This week’s Chronicle Review contains a point-of-view piece by the University of Maryland’s Matthew Kirschenbaum that captures what I wish I had said above very effectively:  “How Reading is Being Reimagined.”

3 Responses

  1. If these are issues that interest you, I highly recommend following the blog of the Institute for the Future of the Book: http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/ (if you don’t already).

    That’s how I found out about BookGlutton, and the blog is regularly engaging with fundamental questions about practices of reading and the ways in which technology is challenging and changing our understanding of books/texts. One recent post about the concept of “collective reading:” http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2007/11/reading_as_collective_enterpri.html.

    Interestingly, I haven’t seen a post there yet about the NEA study, although there have been several on the Kindle.

    Martha - November 21st, 2007 at 2:11 am
  2. Thanks, Martha. I’m now a subscriber to that blog, thanks to your recommendation.

    chip - November 21st, 2007 at 7:29 am
  3. Quick update — there has been a fascinating reaction to the NEA report on the Future of the Book blog, with some insightful criticism of the NEA methodology. I can’t say that I’ve yet seen information that eases my concerns about the capacity of coming generations to engage with complex texts. Most of the reaction seems aimed at arguing the finer points of definition for the broader concepts “reading” and “literacy.” Great discussion, in any case.

    chip - December 2nd, 2007 at 2:57 pm

Leave a Reply

Spam prevention powered by Akismet